THE PROBLEM PSYCHOLOGICAL MOTIVATION EXTERNALIZATION MATERIALIST WORLDVIEW

Abstract

The article deals with topical issues of making, spreading and popularizing worldviews of materialistic type. A number of internal problems related to exteriorization have been identified, in particular: 1) grounds for motivating the subject and 2) psychological justification for the need or desirability of sacrifices and efforts required to advance their picture of the world.
The materialistic picture of the world in the context of the present does not require the truth of faith or unbelief as salvific, as it is presented in the religious dimension of thinking. If it is more comfortable for a person to be in one or another illusion, then comfort and convenience themselves can act as criteria of quality of perception of life. The truth that the material world is not imbued with God cannot be advantageous to the subject of the phenomena of being, since the set of individual experiences in any picture of the world is essentially precisely affective in relation to the notorious «as it really is».
Thus, a consistent herald of materialism is able to explain its behavior only in the discourse in which the semantic load of the ideological theses themselves is lost. If the preaching of the social parameters of my Self-consciousness is motivated by the appropriation of the alien world by subordination to these parameters, then does it not matter what to preach, if it is a manifestation of unconscious xenophobia or the desire for unanimity as a condition of comfortable social space? Both options are, in essence, the same need to socialize one’s outlook as a method of strengthening it.
The original premise of biology does not make a fundamental difference between the mechanisms of experience: joy, pain, envy and sympathy. At the level of evolutionary biology, all human states have no axiological gradation. The basic directions of modern psychology inscribe the moral laws in the abyss of being, to provide a fundamental premise that gives meaning and significance to the activity of the psychologist.
Conclusion: In context of the material universe, the task of transposing a set of neural network responses from one cranial box to another cannot be of fundamental importance. The absence of the category of “proper” and “proper” in materialistic ontology makes the question of motivation insoluble in philosophical discourse and problematized in the field of psychic research. In practice, the socio-psychological causes of exteriorization of one’s worldview compensate for these complexities of the philosophical plan.